Channel LSV: ZEN ZEN WWK Draft #1 – Match 3, Game 2

Posted: 10-03-2010 | 08:02:44 Category: Strategy Games


Luis Scott-Vargas shares his thoughts while playing game two of the third round of Channel LSV: Zendikar Block ZEN ZEN WWK Draft #1.

Category: Strategy Games by admin

19 Responses to “Channel LSV: ZEN ZEN WWK Draft #1 – Match 3, Game 2”

  1. HeavenBreezes, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    I am wondering how do u customize your game interface? I want to change mine T.T

  2. huricane, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    MODO <3 LSV

  3. fatdogwiggle, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Awesome draw that game 6 cards vs. 11 lands. Being good can’t always be enough.

  4. nathones, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    so many lands

  5. SkullieBullie, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Awesome!
    Lsv > Chuck Norris

  6. deck7star, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Thank you very much! I’ve been hanging out for your new drafts with Worldwake. I’ve been doing very badly and I’ve already learnt from this draft.

  7. raist840, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Thanks for posting all these drafts. I’ve watched almost all of your videos and I can without a doubt say my drafting is much, much better because of it. FNM first place for a month! Thanks!

  8. tanaros91, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Should have attacked with quag vampire, blood seeker, and guul draz vampre when he only had calcite snapper and plant token. The one damage gets through and grows the guul draz vampire so it survives if he blocks with calcite snapper. Doesnt change the result but I think it was a misplay.

  9. Rowsol84, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    11 lands / 6 non lands. Gotta love luck.

  10. Sichuanbeef, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Sweet vampire draft deck, bad luck to draw so many lands though. Better luck next time and thanks for the draft vid.

  11. aaaaaaaaooooooo, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    I guess this match shows us what the 1/1 vampires deck’s worst matchup is. Consistent early blockers that are slightly larger than your guys (especially that shrouded ninja turtle!), then midrange beef to outclass the vampires. The early onslaught doesn’t work so well without removal.

    Maybe a kitesail or something could give the deck another dimension.

    In this game’s case, maybe putting in forests for the baloth could have created another win condition, even if it was risky.

  12. hypn0t1c, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Convertible turtle just wrecks that deck, you didn’t even get a gatekeeper. With that many 1 drops I think 16 land would have been plenty.

  13. pog0, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Quag Vampires on turn 1 makes me a sad panda.

  14. bighaben, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    Not a bad first draft? Nothing will probably top your runs at San Diego.

    Thanks for the drafts, their fun to watch, and have taught me much. :)

  15. Sorret, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    land flood is the worst way to lose.

  16. heartybbq, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    “fetchland, must be nice” lol

  17. Chibixxslave, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    i think u would’ve done better if u drafted mono green

  18. HikariKage, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    10 of 17 swamps… pretty brutal.

  19. envoyofthizz, on March 10th, 2010 at 8:02 am Said:

    calcite snapper is pretty good

Leave a Reply